Public Meeting place for the daily exchange of ideas and
information about ethical lapses, triumphs, and theories

Ethics in the News from the non-profit Center for Ethical Studies at www.saintjamescollege.org
SOLICITING YOUR COMMENTS, IDEAS, and EXPERIENCES
Practical Ethics!  ARCHIVE-1
Ethics BLOG Daily
Practical Ethics Daily Blog
Practical Ethics Forum
Professor Anne Pogson
Administrator-Editor
    Practical
    Ethics
    Daily Blog

Our Practical Ethics Blog
Daily / Practical Ethics
Forum is available for all!
We offer public access and
a safe, congenial, meeting
place for ethics
discussion.  We welcome
courteous interchange
about morality, ethnic,
women's issues,
environmental, political,
social justice, religious,
corporate, academic,
scientific, personal rights
and freedoms as well as  
philosophical Ethics in the
News.  

Practical Ethics Daily Blog
is made possible by the
non-profit Center for Ethical
Studies at www.
saintjamescollege.org.

Practical Ethics in the
News features blog entries
from faculty and academic
professionals, students,
and the general public
interested in ethical issues.

You may read -- and are
encouraged to comment
on -- any and all ethical
issues that impact your life,
your institutions, your
nation, and the global
community at large.

Send your comments to:
blog@saintjamescollege.org
_____________________________________________________________________
Only 6% of Americans think Congress is doing a good job!
September 17, 2011 - Samuel K. Pickney, Arlington,VA                                                            
_____________________________________________________________________________
That statistic pretty much speaks for itself.  I am what you would call apolitical,
I don't particularly care for the politicians of either party. Both my wife and I feel that
we should have term limits to get rid of the people in Congress who so thoroughly abuse
their power (forget about responsibility -- they have!).  People say that some men and
women get elected out of a sincere desire to serve our nation.  Unfortunately, most
Americans believe that somewhere during Senators' and Representatives' first term,
most of them become bottom feeders, as this new poll clearly shows.


______________________________________________________________
    Politicians often lie -- that has been well established in recent
    years. Now, though, a fed-up group of professors are offering
    a reward to catch presidential candidate Michele Bachmann in
    what they call a dangerous lie to the American people
    September 15, 2011 - Ann Pogson professor, www.saintjamescollege.org
______________________________________________________________
It is long overdue, this challenging a politician to prove suspect statements to be true or false.  In 2007, Texas
governor Rick Perry signed an executive order that would have mandated that all sixth grade girls receive
vaccinations against the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which is a sexually transmitted disease that has been
demonstrated to lead to cervical cancer.

The story might have remained in the past except for Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.  The
Republican presidential candidate has been publicly criticising Perry for taking his 2007 action, claiming that it
is shockingly "wrong to force innocent young 12-year old girls to receive vaccinations that 'would teach
sexual
promiscuity.'

Following a recent debate among the GOP candidates, Bachmann said: ""there's a woman who came up
crying
to me tonight after the debate...she said her daughter was given that vaccine. She told me her daughter
suffered mental retardation as a result of that vaccine."

Bachmann then repeated the tale many times to news organizations....

Now, however, U of M bioethics professor Steven Miles and his former supervisor, U-PA bioethics director
Art Caplan, have offered a total of $11,000 if someone comes forward with medical records proving Rep.
Bachmann's story to be true.

Professor Miles says that these kinds of unsubstantiated statements can do enormous harm to society,
particularly when they originate with public officials who should be trustworthy sources.

If Bachmann's story pans out, wonderful.  However, if it turns out that a high-profile member of Congress
absolutely acted with reckless disregard for the truth, perhaps, just perhaps, this could serve as a wake-up call
for others with public podiums

One can hope
.
______________________________________________________________
Businesses that fail to provide information needed by would-be customers not
only hurt themselves, but also the person who is trying to purchase their
goods and services
September 12, 2011 - B.J. Wolffer, MBA professor, www.saintjamescollege.org                                                                 
___________________________________________________
Saturday morning, a friend and I wanted to shop at a regionally popular lighting fixture store named
"Macrombie's - We Light Up Your Life!" She and her husband are remodeling and they gave themselves a
$700 budget to buy high-quality track lighting for their living room and a top-of-the-line ceiling fan for their
brand new kitchen.

We drove to their location and were pleased to see the OPEN sign flashing in the front window.  We felt even
better when the HOURS sign on the door stated that the business was open until 4:00pm on Saturdays.  Since
it was only one o'clock, we were surprised to discover that the door was locked!

    The showroom lights were on and you could plainly see at least two
    employees moving about inside.  "No problem," we thought. "Certainly,
    they are unaware the someone, probably a departing customer,
    inadvertently locked their entrance door."  All we had to do was knock,
    right?

    And, knock we did.  Only, the people inside steadfastly refused to look in
    our direction.  We jumped up and down, waving our arms, laughing.  My
friend had been a member of her college gymnastics team and she did a wonderful cartwheel right there on
the sidewalk!  I am certain that one of the employees noticed this novel performance out of the corner of his
eye -- was that just a glint of a smile on his face as he quickly turned away?

Our next attempt was to dial the number prominently displayed in large, attractive, blue letters in the middle
of the door.  

No answer.  Well, that's not exactly true.  There was an answer, although it was a robo voice mail system.
After listening carefully to all the options, we shook our heads in dismay:  notably missing from the menu
was any indication as to how to get an actual homo sapiens to respond to an incoming call from a potential
customer.  

One can frequently access a human either by dialing "O" (uninvited)  or by doing nothing and merely
remaining on the line.  Hopefully, we tried both of these "tricks" only to be forwarded back to the automated  
voice, which said, "If you would like to have our menu items repeated, push '1' ...."

We gave up and left, driving to a nearby community where we located a more user-friendly store.  My friend
ended up placing an order for over a thousand dollars worth of lights, spontaneously adding an attractive
outdoor lighting fixture for her home's entryway.  As she made the unanticipated purchase of the exterior
lamp not on her original list, her eyes gleamed as she proclaimed triumphantly, "There!  That should teach
Macrombies not to be open when they say they are!"

She added that she will never again be a visitor to the lighting shop.

The experience has inspired me to create a new course for the college...one that will help businesses to
understand that a single negative experience such as ours may result in the loss not only of an immediate sale
but, more than likely, the loss on any possibility of future sales by that customer and his or her friends.

But, there is another side to this:  It possible to postulate an ethical position from this incident that the
disappointment that the event caused my friend and me resulted in a totally unnecessary infliction of pain.  
Hurting someone is always an ethical issue!  Add to this that my friend and I had to drive all the way to
another town and back in order to complete our purchase, unnecessarily using approximately $14.00 in gas
and using up four extra hours of our weekend, "ethics" certainly does come into play.  

I called Macrombies this morning to let them know what happened, thinking that a respected local heritage
business would be interested in some helpful feedback from a person would found it impossible to become a
customer there; even having tried turning cartwheels to no avail!  Instead, the person who answered the
phone replied in a pleasant, even chirpy voice, "oh, we always close early on Saturday if we are short a
person on the floor.  Thannnnnk you for calling Macrombies!"  Following which, the line went dead.

No apology was offered, no offer to assist me at this point.  (It would have been at least some consolation if
she has said something along the lines of, "Is there anything that we can do to make things right at this point
in time?"

I am going to write this course and propose it to the college's Curriculum Committee. However, I am so
excited about how inept "customer service" causes ethical disruptions in people's lives that I decided to offer
this particular story on our Saint James College Seminary Daily Practical Ethics Blog.

If you are in business, don't make it so damned hard for people to buy your goods or services!

______________________________________________________________
NO MORE SPEECHES, PLEASE!  If
we Republicans don't respond to the
president's speech, Obama should
declare a coast-to-coast emergency and
call out the National Guard to begin
rebuilding our highways, bridges, and
flooded downtowns if Congress continues
to do nothing about our crumbling
infrastructure
September 8, 2011 - Francis Perlmutter, Austin, TX                                                                 
___________________________________________________
Briefly, it was interesting to sit back and watch as the world community shook its head at how insanely the
American Congress was behaving as it bickered while our economy tanked.  It is no longer interesting, nor
funny.  With President Obama making another huge speech on the topic, many of us Republicans made fun
of his use of the teleprompter and seemingly inexhaustible willingness to talk, talk, talk, without getting
anything done.  But, you know what?  Even as a life-long Republican, I must say that our lawmakers are as
crazy as Nero was as he played his violin, doing nothing at all, as Rome burned to the ground.  Our
congressional representatives and senators are looney as hell, arguing about ending the much-needed
Medicare and Social Security programs while doing NOTHING at all about getting the U.S. labor force back
to work.  I am ashamed of the lunatics who have hijacked by Grand Old Party but I an NOT ashamed of
being an American.  I would even support President Obama if he were to say "Enough!" and to call out the
National Guard.  Somebody has to do something and in spite of the fruitcakes in both parties, that
"somebody" has to be the government.  Since the legislative branch has increasingly proven itself to be totally
useless, that "somebody" has to be the executing branch -- The White House.  Enough speech, Mr. Obama.  
There are real people out here unable to afford homes, cars, or medical care.

EDITOR'S COMMENT:  While we understand this respondent's frustration,there is no constitutional
possibility that the National Guard could be utilized to correct a political dilemma.  We invite you to record
your concerns and ideas for solutions but we do ask that you please refrain from inflammatory or totally
unreasonable rhetoric.  Thank you!

______________________________________________________________
A Labor Day without jobs.  I wanted to see what you would say about that,
then I noticed your FREE college courses for the unemployed!
September 5, 2011 - Nel M., Los Angeles, CA                                                                 
___________________________________________________
We love your Practical Ethics Blog and, as an assistant professor at a different university, I often read what
    you have going on and, I must admit, I frequently borrow a topic just to warm up my
    students before starting our class.  I got the idea from one of your classes, which I took
    as an online seminar.  Called The Bullpen, I throw out a topic at the beginning of class
    and then open up a free-wheeling exchange among my students "just to see how much
    they are learning" about ethics and morality.  We just started a new fall semester class
    last week so we are only beginning to explore the topic. Still, I find that it opens each
    class in a relaxed but engaging manner.  The reason I am writing is that I teach
tomorrow and wondered what "was out there" on the subject when I saw on your homepage that you school
is giving away college-level certificate seminars for free to 25,000 unemployed people.  My school's budget is
so strapped that we can't give away a free Coke!  I am amazed!  What you are doing isn't simply more
academic-economics-political rhetoric: WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS PRACTICAL ETHICS IN ACTION!  
The Women's College and its sister school must be truly exciting places at which to work!

_____________________________________________________________
NGO special on bedbugs last evening has me thinking about alligators
September 4, 2011 - Martha Landermeier, Naples, FL                                                                     
___________________________________________________
Last night my husband Bill and I settled in
front of the tv to watch a special on the
National Geographic channel about bedbugs.
It sure doesn't seem like the most thrilling
program ever produced but the other
thousand channels were not that interesting,
either.

We have heard a great deal about bedbugs
invading hotels and apartments, especially in
the New York City region.

The fact is that we learned a lot about them
last night and how dangerous they are and
how much research is being done to try
containing them.

During the break, there was a commercial for the NGO program coming up next:  one about killer crocodiles.

This one really got my husband and me talking over breakfast.  Just four days ago, 90 year old Margaret
Webb was walking along a canal in nearby Copeland, Florida. We wish that your school would try doing
something about this outrage because we know that your Department of environmental Sciences is doing a
study in the Everglades, right there at Copeland.
(
http://www.thewomenscollege.org/EnvironmentalScience.html)

Our problem is that they are spending huge amounts of money trying to eradicate bed bugs, and hooray for
them!  It is a worthy pursuit!  But, killer alligators roam our area with impunity.  They are protected.  If you
tried to kill one, you would be handcuffed and led off to jail!

The one that attacked Ms. Webb is supposed to be only 8-feet long.  This is a baby compared to the
monsters we have to look at everyday.  Many are double that size!  

We are frankly disgusted that the same government that is wisely trying to stamp out bed bugs forces us to
live with pre-historic monsters crawling through our yards, crossing our roads, and lying just beneath the
surface of our lakes, ponds, even roadside ditches, waiting to pounce and kill.  

Why doesn't some politician run on a platform seeking to allow private individuals to shoot these mindless
killers when one is spotted?  

And, the same is true with the 20-foot pythons that now infest our sideroads, parks, backyards, trees and,
yes, being aquatic, also our ponds, lakes, beach areas, and drainage ditches.  We live with panthers, black
bear, black widow spiders,
Dengue Fever-carrying aedes mosquitos, West Nile Disease, hurricanes....  It is
ridiculous that a 90-year old woman can't go down to a canal to look at the water without fear of being
murdered by a beast that the government we pay for is insisting on protecting.

I am not an activist.  I have never written anything like
this before in my life!  But, someone has to begin speaking
out about this.  We pay taxes on our land and the deed says
we are supposed to have free use to enjoy it.  Yet, even
though we pay to use our own land, the government tells us
that we must permit eight to twenty foot-long killers to roam
on our very own land and community.  And, OUR FOLKS
ARE ARRESTED FOR "POACHING" IF WE TRY TO
TAKE PRACTICAL STEPS TO PROTECT OURSELVES,
OUR ELDERS, OUR LIVE STOCK, OUR PETS, AND OUR
CHILDREN!!!

Thank you.  I wish I could say that writing this makes my husband and me feel better.  Actually, though, it
just has me even more worked up.  The very idea that our own government can leave us vulnerable to this
sort of horror makes my blood boil!

EDITOR'S NOTE: 54 year old Janie Melsek was killed on Sanibel by a 12-foot, 3-inch gator.  She was
landscaping at a small pond when attacked.  She died in the hospital of an infection apparently inflicted by
the gator.  Lauri Olin, 56, also of Sanibel, was working on another small pond when attacked by a 6-foot, 7-
inch alligator.  Robert Steele, 82, was killed while walking his dog along a foot path in the J.N. “Ding”
Darling National Wildlife Refuge.  The gator lept from the water, dragging Mr. Steele under.  And, a 74-year
old woman was pulled under by a 9-foot, 7-inch alligator on Sanibel,although she was rushed to the Health
Park hospital in Ft. Myers where surgeons were able to save her life.

All of these reports just mentioned are from
one small Florida island!

Our research shows that, with the year just over half-completed, there have been alligator attacks on people
in Florida this year.  There have been 22-fatalities stemming from alligator attacks in the state since 1973.
Murray said he doesn’t recall any other Sanibel gator attacks on humans recently.

The latest bite brings to eight the number of people bitten by gators this year in Florida. Since 1948, 491
people have been bitten. There have been 22 fatalities attributed to alligator bites and attacks since 1973,
records show.

Interestingly, state officials say that they "
believe" that there are now more than a million alligators roaming
wild and unrestricted in Florida.  Our
Department of Environmental Sciences believes that the actual number
may be two to even three times as high, based on local surveys extrapolated over the entire state.


_____________________________________________________________
Obama does it again.  This time, he's backing down on pollution control,
hamstringing his own EPA.  I love the guy and really want to support him, but I
am afraid that he's becoming a Republican
September 3, 2011 - Fred Schulte, North Dakota                                                                      
___________________________________________________
    Earlier today I was looking at your Practical Ethics Blog/Forum as my wife and I do
    every day.  You generate such interesting conversations, both in our home, and at our
    respective offices.  I must say, though, that the comments recently posted by Edie
    Franzese in Arizona caused us to grimace.  We were ardent supporters of President
    Obama and his call for much-needed change in America.  Lately, I've noticed that we
    appear a bit downcast, sagging affect, when we discuss the president and his doings.

We were thinking, Ms. Franzese, "give it a rest!" when we read her comments about Obama conceding to
Republicans on the date of his request for a joint meeting of Congress to discuss the economy.  Then, this
afternoon, we read that he has sided with the GOP on curtailing the authority of the Environmental Protection
agency.

OMG!

Today, though, MORE "back down" news from The White House.  The president has ordered the EPA to
walk away from its much-touted clean-air regulation!

The agency's plan was to reduce the amount of smog and other airborne pollutants that currently pose a
clearly-demonstrated threat to our health.  But, the pro-business Republican who control the House of
Representatives have been loudly protesting that the EPA regulations would "hurt business" and further stall
America's lagging economy.

It would be hard to swallow if Obama did this once a year or so.  But, it's become a repeated way of doing
business with the administration.

Here, our "change your can believe in" president has knuckled under to the right wingers TWICE in ONE
week!

The one hope appears to be that the American Lung Association says that the president has caved into
corporate polluters and the group says that they may now name President Obama in the same suit they had
originally brought against George W. Bush.

So, we now have a pro-health agency that sued an actual Republican president, and one who increasingly
ACTS Republican.

Tonight, my wife and I are sad for our republic.


___________________________________________________
Obama:  Here is a non-slam slam and discussion of sane thinking
September 1, 2011 - Edie Franzese - Arizona                                                                                                                                       
___________________________________________________
Let me start by stating that I am a democrat and that I have been an erstwhile supporter of President Obama.
But, I can no longer hold my silence at the obvious extreme passivity in a man whom so many of us thought
to be strong, decisive, and determined.  Not only did he start caving into Republican onslaught that made it
clear on Day One that there would be no bi-partisanship, the president has continued to melt in the face of
Republican opposition and one-sided political demands.

The latest, of course, is the Obama back-down on the request for a joint meeting of both houses of congress
to review jobs development.  The Republicans insisted that The White House was only scheduling it for the
same night as a GOP debate at the Ronald Reagan Library in California (sponsored by NBC and Politico).  

The Republicans say this was an obvious ploy to diminish the debate's potential tv audience.  

Instead, Republican House Majority Leader, John Boehner "granted" the administration
the "right" to hold the joint meeting the next day.  Only, guess what?  That day is the
opening of the National Football League season with the New Orleans Saints playing the
Green Bay Packers.  

So, do you join me in supposing that half -- or more -- of the president's potential
television office will be watching football instead of the probably boring (but still
important) unveiling of the Obama plan to heal our economy?

Boehner has been all smiles in his news show appearances since once again trumping the Obama team.

And, yet, the president keeps allowing this sort of thing to happen, over and over and over and over and over.

Recall the old saying:  "Insanity is doing the same thing the same way and expecting a different outcome."

____________________________________________________
Sheep.  Or lemmings.  Which have we become?
August 31, 2011 - Debra Lynchfield - NY                                                                                                                                       
___________________________________________________
After reading Dr. Pogson's comments on the banning of 9-11 First Responders and clergy from the 10th
anniversary observance at Ground Zero, I discussed the situation with my friend, Marybeth.  Her first
reaction was that Americans have become passive sheep, being dominated by the politicians whom we have
elected.

This didn't feel quite right to me.  I think instead of lemmings.  Norway
lemmings migrate in search of food and new habitats.  Hundreds of thousands
may make the common journey.  Although the notion of "mass suicide" is
folklore, their journeys often take them to bodies of water which they can
theoretically swim.  But, following their crowd into the water, it may prove to
be too swift or, perhaps, too wide, and many perish.  There are some, however, that survive.  But, they
continue to follow the masses.

In view of what is happening in our nation (with none much objecting) I leaning toward thinking of us
Americans as lemmings rather than as sheep.

Thank you for you great blog.  It is such an important service in our sadly-declining world.  No clergy, no
prayers, no First Responders indeed.



_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
The 10th anniversary 9-11 memorial ceremony will BAN all First Responders
and Clergy -- there will be no prayer allowed!
August 28, 2011 - Professor Anne Pogson, Saint James College Seminary
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
You may well have heard of the banning of minister, priests, rabbis and, yes, imams, at the 9-11
commemoration at Ground Zero.  But, as outrageous as this no-prayer rule is (in our One Nation Under
God), we need to turn our attention to the far beyond mind boggling fact that
No first responders will be permitted to participate!!!

Even though religious communities are trying to be polite about the exile of God from the observances, the
dis-inviting of the First Responders has sensible people everywhere in states of stunned disbelief.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is ultimately the person responsible for these outrageous decisions because he is
the person who signed the "rules" covering the commemoration.  The First Responders were men and
women from the New York City police and fire departments who were first at the scene of the World Trade
Center buildings on that fateful 9/11.

As the Twin Towers burned and crashed to the ground, crushing and burning to death hundreds of these
courageous people who
were at the scene to save others.  Those who didn't die at the scene have had years of COPD, cancer, heart
disease, and other tragic medical conditions with which to deal.  

It is hard to know what to say be way of closing.  We the People have lost control of our political process.  
No longer do many, oh so many, politicians serve
us.

_____________________________________________________________
Mexican president blames Barack Obama for slaughter of 52 innocent
civilians in drug war
August 26, 2011 - Professor Anne Pogson, The Women's College Seminary
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
While American television has dropped all coverage of any story other than the threat presented by Hurricane
Irene, next door in Mexico four cars pulled up in front of a casino in wealthy Monterrey, ran inside, poured
gasoline on the carpets and the fixture, and ignited dozens of innocent people

The body count: 52 people killed by a drug war in which they were reportedly not involved.

And, Mexico's president, Felipe Calderon, places a huge amount of the blame on the U.S.  Calderon has
issued an uncharacteristically angry charged that the United States must shoulder a great deal of the
responsibility.

"Why?" you may wonder at first blush."

Because of the United States' "insatiable demand" for drugs, the Mexican president (perhaps reasonably)
charged.

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE   
_____________________________________________________________________
Bill Nye The Science Guy, Hurricane Irene, and the Federal Government
August 25, 2011 - Chris Nichols
______________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Hello.  I was just watching Bill Nye The Science guy on MSNBC and he said that
    Hurricane Irene, the heat and drought conditions, and this spring's flooding and
    tornadoes will be shown to stem from global warming.  Nye said, "The American people
    are starting to understand that our government doesn't have any climate change policy at
    all."

    Faculty response:   You may want to read a report that we recently published:  
Drought-Heat-Climate Change


_____________________________________________________________________
Governor Christie now wants Federal Aid after all
August 25, 2011 - Susan Zendle
_____________________________________________________________________
While I was reading Chris Nichols' observations on Hurricane Irene, I had the tv on.  They were interviewing
Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey.  He suddenly wants federal financial assistance which is interesting
since he has repeatedly been on the record that he wants his citizens to be "as far removed from the federal
government as possible."  I hope that you will print this as it is not a slam, just a reporting of what I just
heard.  He and politicians like him want to cut Medicare because they are rich enough that it won't impact
them in the least but they are willing to switch positions on a dime if hurricane damage can be paid for by
Washington instead of their own budgets.  The whole thing makes me angry, and sad.


____________________________________________________________________
The explosion of the Russian rocket
en route to resupply the space station
causes a second look at President
Obama's decision to curtail the Space
Shuttle Program
August 24, 2011 - Col. Roger Curlew
____________________________________________________________________
Only a fool would think that the U.S. doesn't need
to cut expenses.  We do.  Crazy overspending is
eroding the financial future of our nation.  However, while we need to spend less, much less, indiscriminate
cutting is foolhardy and is no cure for our problems.  I have spent a large part of my life on overseas
assignments and I can tell you that, if there is one thing that the United States is known and respected for, it
is our space program.  Think about it.  Think for a moment about all the scientific advances, about the
inventions and discoveries we've made because of our space shuttle.  But, these pale in the light of the
world's view of America's brilliant commitment to discovery, and the expansion of the human experience.

I voted for President Obama and I think that he has more on his plate than any three or four previous
presidents combined.  He does need to correct the course of America's financial ship, as it were.  As a
military man, I have to swallow hard when saying this, but the president who won the Nobel Peace Prize
needs to end the wars that are draining both our citizens' savings and spirits.  We need the space shuttle
much more than all the drones and rockets.

Paying the Russians over 50-million dollars per passenger to take us to the space station we helped build is ill-
advised.  However, now the Russian resupply rocket has just exploded, destroying the rocket, of course, and
also 6,000 pounds in supplies and equipment.  Plus, it is raising questions about the ultimate safety of the six
astronauts currently aboard the International Space Station, some of whom are reportedly scheduled to return
to earth in a couple of weeks.  That certainly can't happen until there is an extensive review of what went
wrong with the Russian supply ship, possibly even until after a lengthy redesign of some aspects of the ship.

President Obama, God love him, has made a terrible mistake in discontinuing our shuttle program.

____________________________________________________________________
Blogs and Pseudonyms - Real names only, please
August 23, 2011 - Ashley Ashborne (this is a pseudonym
____________________________________________________________________
The National Geographic Society has announced that it is implementing a new policy that will bar the use of
pseudonyms by its blog participants.  Then, in talking with my friend Adam (real name), I learned that both
Google and Facebook also strictly ban the use of "pen names" on their sites.  While I must concede the
legality of this practice, it is this seems like an ethical violation of people's rights to security and privacy.

We are familiar with the all too frequent bullying that occurs on the internet in general and on blogs and
Facebook specifically.  

Women have also found themselves victimized by stalkers, burglars, and rapists.

Perhaps more common, many people who have used their true identities on the internet, have been "punished"
by their bosses for expressing a point of view that is not shared.

It is imperative that people be permitted to speak freely without concerns about reprisal.  I hope that your
excellent
Ethics and You blog will continue to permit pseudonyms.

Faculty response:   Because we have and enforce a Posting Policy, we do not publish negative, derogatory,
or bullying-type remarks.  Our
Ethics and You Blog Policy Board believes that the positive aspects of
permitting the use of pseudonyms outweigh any negatives.  While we prefer "real names" (particularly when
writing in scientific / academic genres),we respect individuals' judgements in choosing to, or not to, use their
own names.  

____________________________________________________________________
When you study something, you actually do change it
August 21, 2011 - Bernecia Dunbar
____________________________________________________________________
I have just finished reading your study on Studying Something Changes It.  I was saddened at the reminder
that merely being close enough to wild animals to study them causes changes in their belief systems, altering
the way they see us humans.  When I was an undergraduate student, I volunteered to study white tailed deer
in Upstate New York.  We were lodged at the large country home of a farmer near Norwich.  Deer
frequently entered the farmer's pastures and always bolted whenever we students turned up.  We used long-
range sound sensors to tape their grunts and squeals and we had powerful tripod-mounted binoculars and
cameras.  We observed as the farmer's dogs drew close, as crows pecked at the ground near the deer's feet,
as storms blew up, the whole gamut.  

As the weeks ensued, we watched as the small white spots disappear from the fawns coats.  And, slowly,
unbidden, the deer began growing accustomed to our presence and, trusting that we bore them no ill will,
they began grazing closer and closer to us.  Eventually, we were able to discontinue using our long-range
sound and viewing equipment.  We even gave the deer names.

At length, summer ended and we returned to campus.  

I'm an urban kid and that summer spent up in the country was both challenging an eye-opening blessing.  I
had never gotten to "know" wild animals before and these gentle animals found a place in my heart.  At
Christmas recess, just on a whim, I called the farmer to see how "our" deer were doing.  He told me that they
had become so trusting of humans that the adults had been shot during hunting season.  The fawns hadn't
been seen since.

Now, I am in grad school studying chemistry and physics.  We have learned that there is even research
underway that merely studying "inanimate" molecular structures may impact the behavior of the atomic and
sub-atomic particles, although this is in no way conclusive as of yet.  But, consider the possibilities!


____________________________________________________________________
With nearly 7-million Sudanese needing food assistance, the U.S. is throwing
away contaminated food

August 21, 2011 - Rev. Stan Randall
____________________________________________________________________
As many of us weep in our hearts for the dreadful plight on the Sudanese people, back-to-back headlines
stunned me into a "head-shaking moment" this morning.
  • The United Nations World Food Programme believes that upwards of seven million people are in
    desperate need of food aid in The Sudan.  
  • And, right next to that headline is one that says:  "U.S.D.A. Continues Search for Cause of Bacterial
    Contamination Forcing Recall of 44-million Pounds of Chicken"

While I am certainly not advocating sending dangerous foodstuffs to starving people, I nevertheless ponder
why we were careless enough to spoil all that meat in the first place.  And, musing, I wonder how many
innocent lives we could have prolonged if, somehow, we could have sent 44-million pounds of non-
contaminated chicken to those who are so desperately clinging to life in the face of this unconscionable
starvation.


____________________________________________________________________
Here is such an apt church sign that I just had to send it in:
August 19, 2011 - Charlyze Petersen
____________________________________________________________________

"God needs people with spiritual fruits
...
Not religious nuts"
Apparently unaware
of the danger, this
little girl is kissing
a four-foot alfligator.
(Each inch between
the beast's nostrils
and ridge containing
its eyes equals one
foot in overall length.)

THIS
ALLIGATOR
COULD
EASILY KILL
THIS CHILD!
Lemming



____________________________________________________________________
    If Bigfoot is "humanish," could it be a "child of God" with a
    soul?  Could it be "saved"?  Could a Bigfoot go to heaven?  
    September 18, 2011 - Fr. Peter Dettler, Chicago, IL   
    __________________________________________________________________
    Hello!  I just read your published interview of Larry Battson by Fish and Wildlife historian, Dr.
    Mark Madison.  If these creatures are sharing our planet, many questions emerge to we
    religious ethicists.  In an obscure sidebar, you opened the discussion of God's possible
relationship with Bigfoot, Yeti, etc., if they exist.  This a fascinating topic for all of us, not particularly so for
a seminary such as yours.  Good luck on this one!  Even as a young priest, I would stare up at the stars and
wonder if Jesus would have to go and save the inhabitants of other planets.  But, honestly, I never thought
about other creatures of God on
this planet.  Your inquiry may lead you down some strange paths, but what
a sacred journey!
RETURN TO BLOG HOME
RETURN to